Copyright © 2000 - 2007 Printed and authorized by Joe Rossi 87 Findon Road, Woodville South 5011.
| Said | Prime Minister Bob Hawk said No Child will live in poverty by 1990. |
| Result | More Children live in poverty after 1990. |
| Said | Prime Minister Paul Kitting said No the recession we had to have. |
| Result | Australia near bankrupt in 2008 |
| Said | Prime Minister Paul Kitting said about abolishing Australian import duty should be reduced to zero. |
| Result | Australia recession we had to have in 2008 |
| Said | Prime Minister Paul Kitting said Australia should compete into the world market. |
| Result | Labor gives incentive packages to save jobs in Australia in 2008 |
| Said | Prime Minister Paul Kitting said Australia should have a GST. |
| Result | Australia Labor States have double taxation on pay roll tax in 2008. |
| Said | Prime Minister John Howard said Australia should have the same GST on all goods and services 10%.. |
| Result | Australia Labor States introduces other taxes such as coco pop , cigarette and petrol tax in 2008. |
| Questions | |
| Questions | Prime Minister Kevin Rudd what other varied taxes does he want to introduce in the future? |
| Questions | What was Prime Minister Kevin Rudd doing when campaigning at the last election(2007)? |
| Questions | Why did Kevin Rudd not pick up the signs of recession before the election of 2007. |
| Questions | Why did Kevin Rudd not pick up the signs that pensioners were struggling and needed $30 a week rise. |
| Questions | Prime Minister Kevin Rudd can not protect children under 10 years of age. |
| Questions | How can Prime Minister Kevin Rudd protect adults over 18 years of age. |
| Questions | How can Prime Minister Kevin Rudd defend Australia of adults over 18 years of age. |
| Questions | Prime Minister Kevin Rudd did not imagine the recession which was occurring during the election of 2007. |
| Questions | How can Prime Minister Kevin Rudd imagine the recovery we are to have during the election of 2013? |
Below are Actual correspondence and reminder Notes without trying to indemnify individuals in child abuse case..
|
To: The Hon. Mark Butler, MP. Minister for Mental Health and Aging. My Local member of Port Adelaide. PO Box 6022, House of Representatives, Parliament House, Canberra ACT. 2600. |
|
From: Mr. Joseph Peter Rossi, 87 Findon Road, Woodville South SA. 5011. Telephone 08-8243 0151 Mobile: 0409 8955 50, Email: joerossi48@optusnet.com.au, Web: jp-rossi-political-sa.info
|
Dated 09/11/2010.
Reference: Family Law Act.
Dear Honourable Minister Butler, MP.
It has been over 12 months since I approached you about needed changes to the Australian Federal Family Law Act. There has already been in the past 2 years over 6 publically known child murders from the hands of violent vindictive parent.
I have tried to be as
unbiased as possible towards any gender father or mother.
I suggest the only solutions possible are as follows.
I am quite happy to come to your office and discuss these important current children problems.
If you consider that the example below is accurate in detail. (I can assure it is). Could you conscience believe that the said children on probability be safe with the father and the environment your government may subject them to. Would you be happy if your children or grandchildren were in such am environment and what would you do about it?
If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.
In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also your considered reply.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully,
Joseph Peter Rossi. Grandfather age 63 years. Local voter.
Get ride of children in a violent
environment AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
Fix shared parenting of non-violent parents latter.
If the good parent can not protect the children in a marriage, how can that parent protect the child in anger, pay back revengeful separated environment? (Consider that)
========== Following example is real ==========
Subject: Children under threat
1) The children between Violent parent, perpetrator, and I Victim Maternal grandfather were:
i. Ethan DOB 09/01/2004.age 6
ii. Bella DOB 10/12/2005 age 5
iii. Michaela DOB 22/09/2007.age 3
iv. Liarna DOB 22/09/2007 age 3
2)
Date of marriage
separation 16/02/2008.
3)
Date of Children Family
Court Final Order was on xx/xx/xx.
4)
Violent parent, perpetrator,
insisted and court agreed to:
i. Violent parent, perpetrator, has not followed court order item Number
Regards Psychological treatment
a) Supplying a Psychological treatment.
b) He has not written to the children per court order dated.
c) He did not inform me or allow the children to be comforted by me. After he rear car crashed with Ethan and Bella were in the car.
d) Violent parent, perpetrator, has not kept me informed of his telephone contact details as reported by him in Mobile text dated 02/11/2010.
e) Has not written to the children per court order dated.
f) He has not returned the children access diary which he
Deliberately kept from December 2009 to now.
5) Violent parent, perpetrator, says the children need a father. That may be so.
But not just a father. They need TO love, comfort, TO laughter WITH, encourage AND PLAY.
a) Something Violent parent, perpetrator, did not show TOWARDS Ethan and Bella when we were together. Violent parent,
perpetrator, joined us at
the playground. He would talk to his parents and friends on the mobile while the children entertained themselves on play equipment.
b) After the birth of Bella Violent parent, perpetrator, did not show any love, comfort, laughter and was not prepared to listen
during our marriage
towards me or the children. He never woke up during the night to assist in looking after a sick child.
c) Violent parent, perpetrator, has not indicated in Text messages, correspondence, or Child excess centre comments after the
final court order
of April 2009. Any love, comfort, laughter behaviour.
g) Ethan has been noticed to by me, my parents and the Adelaide Child care Teachers bight on his tee shirts when stressed especially
after contact with his father.
d) Violent parent, perpetrator, made statements in his own court affidavits that he did believe in celebration of Christmas day with the
extended family but contradicted himself in the first affidavit when he indicates he wanted my mother Annette Maternal grandmother to
go home the day before Christmas day in Sydney 2006
e) I am quite confident that Violent parent, perpetrator, does quiz Ethan and Bella about the contacts they
have with my parents.
(This is indicated by the comments the children make to me and particularly the comments violent parent, perpetrator, himself makes
via text massages to me.
6)
The Family Court implied
that maternal grand parents should not interfere with a couple’s family or
their conflict. Yet Violent parent,
perpetrator, paternal grand parents have being doing just that with requesting
mediation to see their grandchildren.
i.
My parent Joseph Maternal
grandfather did inform Mrs. Pam paternal grandmother in May 2007 that all
parents get together to negotiate
the storm burring between violent parent, perpetrator, and me in the
marriage. Mr. Alan replied that he would not interfere and if he (they)
could not see the grandchild so be it.
ii. Violent parent, perpetrator, made statements in his own court
affidavits that he believe that the maternal grandparents were not
suited to look after the children because the Joe Maternal
grandfather home was unsafe, too small and in a hostile
environment.
a) The fact that with violent perpetrator 2 other siblings have had a similar marriage breaks up.
b) That with the ’s 2 other siblings in-laws have had the same harsh experiences as I with the counterpart equivalent in-laws
` c) The fact that Don ha Came ( nee ) did not allow her parents to discipline her children
d)
The fact that the paternal grandparents live
on a farm with snakes, horses, and an insect as co-habitats makes the site
unsafe for
unsupervised toddler visits.
e)
The fact that 2 other siblings’ counterpart
in-laws have had the same harsh accusations and interference via the
Adelaide Family Law
Court affidavits. This to me indicates that the paternal Grandparents
may not be suitable to have the children with or without supervision
of the father my ex husband.
7) I Victim Bernadette do hereby state based on my experience with Violent parent, perpetrator, over 9 years that :
i.
Violent parent,
perpetrator, like to criticize any member of his family siblings or parents
Or any extended family member. (His previous sibling’s in-laws)
ii.
Violent parent,
perpetrator, likes to win at all costs arguments
iii.
Violent parent,
perpetrator, likes to say what is politically correct but acts like a bully.
a)
New South Wales Court records show that
Violent parent, perpetrator, has been convicted the use of violence towards
me.
b)
South Australian Court records show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has driven passenger
vehicle recklessly while his children were with him.
c)
South Australian Court records
show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has use threats to people
d)
South Australian Family Law
Court records will show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has misled, and
manipulated the truth to the court.
e)
South Australian Family Law
Court records do not show the Army posting orders on which the court made
its final court orders on April 2009.
f)
That Violent parent,
perpetrator, made statements in his own court affidavits that he did
believe in celebration of Christmas day with
the extended family but
contradicted himself in the first affidavit when he indicates he wanted
my mother Annette Maternal grandfather
to leave before I celebrated
Christmas day with her.
8)
I Victim Bernadette do
hereby finally state that I am very concerned about the safety and
emotional conflicts influences Violent parent,
perpetrator, the father will
have on the children without continual Psychological treatment for which
Violent parent, perpetrator, has refused
to under go as per Court order of
April 2009.
9) The Former Husband, Mr. Violent parent, perpetrator, Sydney NSW 2.
10) I Victim Bernadette do hereby give instruction to you my lawyer to:
a)
Not negotiate with the other
party lawyer.
b)
Not divulge particulars
contained here in unless absolutely necessary in an affidavit.
c)
It is based on the perceptions
and experience that lawyers do deals
Behind the scenes without the knowledge of
the litigants (clients).
I Victim Bernadette do hereby finally repeat and stress that I am very concerned about the safety and emotional infliction on the children by the father.
If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.
In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also your considered reply.
Yours sincerely
(Maternal grandfather): ==========, ==========, ==========,
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
11) If going to court again put in the Court documents
Emails:
i. from Violent parent, perpetrator, dated 10/10/2007Just in case you
Did not
Get the message last night
ii. From Joe Maternal grandfather to his father (paternal grandfather)
Allan dated 03/12/2007
Asking for their help.
State in Victim Affidavits that:
a) Violent parent, perpetrator, the father and applicant.
b) Victim (nee Maternal grandfather the mother and respondent.
c) Violent parent, perpetrator, is a habitual lyre.
d) He did not inform his Employer of his Family Court Order status.
e) Violent parent, perpetrator, did not inform his treating Psychologist of the Family Court Order treatment required.
f) Violent parent, perpetrator, did not supply his treating Psychologist report to the wife according to Final Family Court Order due June 2010.
g) Violent parent, perpetrator, did not show any improvement of Anger management.
h) Violent parent, perpetrator, did not corresponded to his former wife Victim vie the Post Office Box address as agreed instead corresponded mostly by mobile Phone text massages on issues that were not urgent..
i) Violent parent, perpetrator, did not inform and supply medical records after the vehicle accident in which he with children Ethan and Bella were involved.
j) Violent parent, perpetrator, did not supply the motor vehicle accident report to the children’s mother Victim after the vehicle accident in which he with children Ethan and Bella were involved.
k) Violent parent, perpetrator, did not inform or invite the children’s mother Victim to the hospital after the vehicle accident in which he with children Ethan and Bella were involved.
12)
Comparing father
Paternal Grand Father and his son
Violent parent, perpetrator of
violent actions.
a)
Paternal Grand Father kicked
his wife’s parents out of his home.
b)
Son
Violent parent
kicked his wife’s parents out of his home.
c)
Paternal Grand Father wife’s
has a fractured eye socket
d)
Son
Violent parent
wife was punched in the eye and received a Broken eye socket.
e)
Paternal Grand Father Son has
an emotional mental problem.
f)
Son
Violent parent
has a son Ethan with an Emotional mental problem.
g)
Paternal Grand Father children
have a social assimilation problem.
h)
Paternal Grand Father
own
Son
and now the Violent parent
has eldest children Ethan and Bella have a social Assimilation problem.
13)
That Violent
parent, perpetrator, deliberately and intentionally did not
want grandparents involved in independently
and
unsupervised excess to the children under any circumstances.
(Refer to Violent parent,
perpetrator, affidavit notes about grandparent Joe Maternal grandfather)
14)
That Violent
parent, perpetrator, deliberately put a court order to make me stay in
Adelaide. Violent parent,
perpetrator,
has been working in Sydney New South Wales. So why should the
restraining order on me be current. I like that removed so I may seek
work
and living quarters as is necessary.
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
15) Reasons for Maternal Grandparent to get involved in Family Court Affidavits.
a) It is not about interfering in proceedings.
b) It is not about putting false allegations.
c) It is about protecting little defenceless children
Against violent parents.
d) It is about perceptions of lawyers doing deal behind the scenes
Without the knowledge of the litigants (clients)
e) It is about having had experience with similar violent
Parents since a teenage.
f) It is about Mr. Violent parent, perpetrator, having had his father
Take no interest in reconciliation to keep the marriage together when conflict between the couple first arose.
i. Mr. Alan has 7 children of which 3 have had a marriage divorce with children being involved.
ii. That the sibling oldest brother Sea on since and during the separation with Jennifer has made similar accusations, innuendoes in the Adelaide Family Court Affidavits.
iii. That the sibling oldest sister Don ha (nee Came since and during the separation with Scott has made similar accusations, innuendoes in the Adelaide Family Court Affidavits.
iv. That now currently violent parent, perpetrator, since and during the separation with Victim Bernadette (nee maternal grandfather) has made similar accusations, innuendoes in the Adelaide Family Court Affidavits.
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
16) Lawyer instructions way to argue for issues on mother's behalf.
a) What ever violent parent, perpetrator, wants I want in reciprocation.
b) .What ever violent parent, perpetrator, and wants for his parents I want For my parents.
c) Would like the Court orders to remain as they are. No changes.
i.) If changes are forced upon me then:
ii.) What Violent parent, perpetrator, and demands for his parents I
Demand for my parents.
(Equal rights what is good for the goose is good for the Gander.).
iii.) Father’s parents not to have unsupervised visits with grandchildren
unless:-
1) The family court assesses the property for safety environment first.
2) The family court assess the family court documents of Father’s siblings divorce affidavits of Donna Cameron and Sean regarding similarity in harassment, allegations and similar children excess conditions.
3) Quotes from Aussie Kids November 2010 Parenting Publication issue page 5.
If you were luck enough to have good parents who resolved conflict well, on which you‘ve been able to model your own behaviour then that’s great…. Learn to vent anger in a healthy way developing listening skills, taking care with how you frame statements or feelings and learning to talk constructively about your problems can help … Given that kids mirror and learning ground in life, it’s imperative that we learn to communicate and solve conflict respectfully.
However negative and destructive behaviour is also passed down within families.
So as to assess the bona fide moral argument put forward by violent parent, perpetrator, and family standards.
4) Army Motto state: Information is on a need to know bases.
Mother's motto is there for the same.
17)
Violent parent, perpetrator,
argued in the last court hearing that he had no extra money to share in the
costs of swimming activities
of the children because of his car debts over 2
years. I am spending $15 each child 26 weeks a year
Total
$ 1,560.00
18)
My question is where has he
got the money to challenge me at this court hearing? Possible answer is his
parents. If so then the court did instruct
my father that grand
parents should stay out of the proceedings.
19)
I the Victim Bernadette
do hereby finally state that I am very concerned about the safety and
emotional conflicts influences
Violent parent, and perpetrator, the father will
have on the children without continual Psychological treatment for which
Violent parent,
perpetrator,
has refused to under go as per Court order of
April 2009.
It is not an argument on adult freedom or parent’s rights of violent parent, perpetrator, or me, but the safety of children first and foremost. Violent parent, perpetrator, has a split personality. One minute he is calm when he gets his way and next he is in a rage and violent when he is challenged.
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
20) Traits, Profile call it what you will:
i. Violent parent, perpetrator, DOB 10/01/1974, Violent, quick Tempered, twists the truth, self interested, and wants to win at all
Costs does not give opinions when opposing views. Does not assess argumentative debates.
ii. Violent parent, perpetrator.
iii. Narcissist. Excessive, self admiration, Personality disorder, self directed sexual desire.
iv. Violent parent, perpetrator, use of words Antonyms with opposite meaning To his actions or behaviour.
v. Ethan has missing 4th Gene in DNA Chromosome.
vi. Bella is a loner. Likes school,
vii. Michaela Thinker, wants to achieve spastic
viii. Liarna Quick learner, happy, wants to try every thing, Sulks.
ix. Violent parent, perpetrator, Partner Grandfather was admitted To Julia Farr
Hospital. (Why) Mental disorder.
x. Violent parent, perpetrator, accused Joe Maternal grandfather My father of being Domineering, violent, bashing, controlling,
No fence constraining children excess to main road. Small house, when in fact he was referring to his own traits.
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
21) Violent parent, perpetrator, Requests
Has informed me (objected to me)
i. Not to contact his Army Psychologist.
ii. Non of my business about his place of abode or home telephone Number.
iii. Has approached the Bella Kindy regards his parent attended
There. I arranged and gave permission but either violent parent, Perpetrator, did not
Inform them or the parents did not attend the Kindy at the arranged Day.
iv. Violent parent, perpetrator, has requested additional whole week Access to Ethan and
Bella only and not the children Michaela and Liarna.
v. Violent parent, perpetrator, has requested additional access to Ethan and Bella only and
Not the children Michaela and Liarna.
vi. Violent parent, perpetrator, has refused to take up the Wednesday Thursday children
Access as per court order.
22) Victim now Requests
i. Would like the Court orders to remain as they are. No changes
ii. that I am very concerned about the safety and
Emotional infliction on the children by the father
iii. Violent parent, perpetrator, the father must continual
Psychological treatment for which Violent parent, perpetrator,
Has refused to under go as per Court order of April 2009.
iv. That the restraining order on me to remain in Adelaide be
Removed so that I may seek work and living quarters as is necessary.
Violent parent, perpetrator, has been working in Sydney New South Wales.
v. That Father’s parents not to have unsupervised visits with grandchildren unless:-
The family court assesses the property for Safety environment first
vi. That Violent parent, perpetrator, pays contribution to the costs
Of swimming activities of the children because of his car
Debts for 2 years. I am spending $15 each child 26 weeks a year
Total $ 1,560.00
========== End of Lawyer instruction ==========
Dictionary Meanings
|
Harass, annoy, bother, pursue > |
Politicians are Aiding, Abetting, Condone, overlook, forgive, have disregard, Consorting, Encourage and are Accomplice to child abuse by their inaction or willingness to correct the problem.
|
Violent parent, perpetrator paid for the dogs in a kennel but can not contribute for the children’s swimming.
|
1, |
Dog Fees $15 a day |
Oct 6 to Oct 31, 2010 |
25 times 30 |
$750.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reference Reading Journals or Books
|
1, |
Aussie Kids Parenting Publication |
Web Site www.aussiekids.net.au |
|
|
2, |
Reference Reading |
|
. |
|
3, |
Reference Reading |
Aussie Kids November 2010 issue |
Page 5.Paragraph 7 & 12 Solving Conflict |
|
4, |
Reference Reading |
Aussie Kids November 2010 issue |
Page 7.all Paragraphs |
I say that item 6 effects and relates to both children and adults alike.
Quotes from Aussie Kids November 2010 Parenting Publication issue page 5.
If you were luck enough to have good parents who resolved conflict well, on which you‘ve been able to model your own behaviour then that’s great…. Learn to vent anger in a healthy way developing listening skills, taking care with how you frame statements or feelings and learning to talk constructively about your problems can help … Given that kids mirror and learning ground in life, it’s imperative that we learn to communicate and solve conflict respectfully.
….. However negative and destructive behaviour is also passed down within families.
|
Worst people in my opinion, I have come in
contact.
|
Narcissist.
Excessive, self
admiration, personality disorder, self directed sexual desire |
It is about perceptions of lawyers getting paid win or lose. and to the lawyers it is just a game of chess.
========== Here after are Quotes only ==========
==========,==========,==========,==========,==========
The cause of multiple personality is not clearly understood, but the condition seems almost invariably to be associated with severe physical abuse and neglect in childhood. It is believed that amnesia, the key to formation of the separate personalities, occurs as a psychological barrier to seal off unbearably painful experiences from consciousness. The disorder often occurs in childhood but may not be recognized until much later. Social and psychological impairment ranges from mild to severe. The primary treatment is psychotherapy to help the individual integrate the separate personalities.
========== Argument for change to the Law. ==========
Victim Bernadette Violent parent, perpetrator, John Grand parents Alan and Pamela
What is potential or real in the following topics? i am trying to argue the case by examples that the
LISTED PROFESSIONALS NEED QUALIFICATION AND VERIFICATION TO DO THE TASKS.
But Violent parents are
not required to under go rehabilitation, or examination to be verified they can
supervise children
without temper tantrum, or resorting to uncontrolled physical or mental assault
on small children.
|
1, |
Potential, Possible, likely, capability, aptitude. |
|
|
2, |
Engineer, coax, |
|
|
3, |
Driving a car under the influence of
drugs 0.05, |
|
|
4, |
Running a red light camera, Do all driver beating red cameras have a crash. No but potential. |
|
|
5, |
A parent s/he has a right to access his/her child no matter with Psychological disorders. |
|
|
6, |
The family Law Court can not force a person to under go Psychological assessment. |
|
|
7, |
Do all car Drivers without a license have a crash. No but potential. |
|
|
8, |
Small toys potential to swallow or chock child under 3 Do all such toys chock child under 3. No but have the potential. |
|
|
|
|
|
Reference: Progression of Violent Parent.
|
1, |
Was quite well mannered person originally. Till the birth of the first child. |
|
|
2, |
Did physically and emotionally assault his wife. |
|
|
3, |
Did emotionally assault and make life threats towards his father-in-law. |
|
|
4, |
Did emotionally assault and mentally disturb his son Ethan and daughter Bella while the 2 parents shared the family home. |
|
|
5, |
Did emotionally and mentally disturb his son Ethan and daughter Bella while car passengers in the car that he recklessly drove into the rear of another car Making his car a complete right off. |
|
|
6, |
Has continually emotionally threatened his wife since the marriage separation and divorce. |
|
|
|
|
|
Yet the hypocritical politicians still require this same person to have unsupervised free access to the children without
|
1, |
Temper tantrum education. |
|
|
2, |
Without supervised medication |
|
|
3, |
Without a certified Psychologist, report. |
|
Why.
|
1, |
Because the law making politicians are inconsistent in law A un road worthy vehicle has the potential to be in accidents but a habitual violent parent has to commit an actual offence of violence to the children. Hard to prove without being present to witness the act. |
|
|
2, |
The history of violence by the parent or extended family members is not taken into consideration because the politicians may lose the persons vote at elections. |
|
|
3, |
The child is not significant a voter to be protected. |
|
|
4, |
Potential child bashing is not a fact or contributing to treasurer revenue rising. |
|
¨
Where is the profiling of
violent parents within the Family Law Courts or Psychologists? A must to do the
right thing for the
Australian Attorney General podium media high moral motto
in legislation “what is best for the Children.”
¨
There are for everything else.
|
To: The Hon. Mark Butler, MP. |
|
From: Mr. Joseph Peter Rossi,
|
Reference: Family Law Act. Dated 04/11/2010
Dear Honourable Butler, MP.
It has been over 12
months since I approached you about needed changes to the Australian Federal
Family Law Act.
There has already been in the past 2 years over 6 publically known child murders
from the hands of violent vindictive parent.
Being as unbiased as possible towards any gender father or mother. I suggest the only solutions possible are as follows.
(Facts 1)
a) Break the cycle of violence from violent parent to child.
b) Less legal costing to passive parent.
c) Less ability to use vendetta by narcissist parent.
d) Less ability for the dominant parent to fudge, manipulates, and fabricates evidence to the detriment of the children.
e) The children will have less emotional distress to carry into adult hood by not being associated weekly from bickering parents.
f) To reduce the number of instances where the dominate parent uses continual financial advantage, threats, Intimidation, physical and or emotional assaults, potentially from a child age 1 to 12 (continually for some 11 years).
g) It will take away the perceived legal right to litigation by a violent parent.
h) It will give forward standards of behaviour to potential parents who love challenging authority (governments, Courts, Police, School teachers, sexual partners) by past and future bad violent behaviour.
I am quite happy to come to your office and discuss these important current children problems.
If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.
In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also
your considered reply. I note that your office tool over 6months to respond
or acknowledge my concerns.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully, Joe Rossi, Maternal Grand father, age 63. Campaigner for Changing the Australian Family Law Act
For which Premier Rann,
Prime Minister Gillard the Australian Attorney General podium media high
moral motto in legislation
“what is best for the Children.” .Which the courts, money hungry lawyers and our
protectors (the parliamentarians) have no moral, no conscience, no balls to
intervene to stopping the circle of violence towards children. Children do not
vote so why intervene and lose the votes of the parents.