Quoted Kerry Packer as saying his father Sir Frank Packer did not teach him anything but Kerry learnt a lot from Frank.  I too can say the same thing about the Liberal party and my parliamentary experience.  The party and parliament did not teach me anything but I learnt a lot being associated with them.
 

Dated 08/01/2011.

Reference: The Public Consultative Family Law Violence Bill 2010.

Family Law Branch, of the Attorney General Department. Issued November 2010

Exposure Draft open until 14 January 2011. 

Unless submissions are marked confidential they may be published. Submissions may be the subject of a request under the Freedom of Information Act 1982.

Dear Chair Person,

Thank you for the opportunity to give my opinion on the Exposure Draft of the Family Law Amendment (Family Violence) Bill 2010.

The submissions that I have put by email on Monday 13/12/2011 at 3.32 PM. and addendum, Marked “A” on 5^th. January 2011 at 5.23 PM (SA, Time)

My submissions are not confidential as they are from persons that I have met and documents I have seen as the

Public Officer & President Self Represented Litigants Support Group, SA. Inc.

I have not been personally involved in the Family Law Courts .I have, how ever attended and witnessed many proceedings and child hand over centres in Adelaide.

I would also like to know if your committee will eventually have a Parliamentary Committee hearing?

Who will Chair such a committee and who will be the Committee panel?

If there is no such intention for a parliamentary committee, why not?

There are many people who are not confident to write a submission due to low education or self esteem. Yet these very people are the one most affected by the present Family Law legislation.

Also the children of such parents are the ones definitely most affected by the domineering violent parent causing continual conflict from their age of 1 year to 20 years due to Family Court Judges forcing shared parenting. There has been many instances that I have been shocked by voluntary comments directly from children ages 6 and lately 2 boys aged 12 and 15 who did not wish to meet their drug addicted mother.

These are the very people you SHOULD interview. If you and the Minister are genuine about fixing the revolving domestic violence in our community.

 I know that CHILD protection expert Freda Briggs believes authorities are having mothers declared mentally ill when they complain their children are the subject of sexual abuse, because they are struggling to cope with an increasing number of victims.

 Yours sincerely, Joe Rossi.

<<<<<     =====     >>>>>.==========è

Welcome to C.H.R.I.S (Children Have Rights In Society)

So here we are ~ 2011 ~ A new fresh year

This website currently holds the profiles of over 10,000 UK convicted Paedophiles. I have many more ready to be added ! So please check daily !

This website has been checked by the police and has been viewed by MAPPA. All profiles can be checked against news and media releases.

Awareness + Knowledge = Prevention

Hi, my name is Chris and I would like to welcome you to The Worlds Largest Database for convicted UK paedophiles, Within this website is a world of corruption, and despicable acts and crimes committed against children of the UK. My aim is to unite all child abuse campaigners of the UK. This website is a collaboration of all other websites which i try to promote to the best of my ability, but has a unique added feature - The name and shame of convicted UK paedophiles

out 4 of children in the UK has suffered child abuse at some point of their lives.

60-70% of sex offenders against children target girls only, about 20-33% boys only, and about 10% children of either sex. ‘The majority of perpetrators sexually assault children known to them, with about 80% of offences taking place in the home of either the offender or the victim’.

the name and shame, I must point out the profiles contain actual events and some graphic content, especially the RIP and child killers sections.

One chilling look at the child sexual assaults and child pornography cases filling our courts tells you that something is very wrong. More troubling still, we are laying the foundation for long-term generational dysfunctional.

Between 1989 and 1994 about 12,000 items of child pornography were seized in Australia. This year, in one case alone, police seized 729,000 child pornography images and 2700 movie files.

It’s become a tidal wave to such an extent that the most common offence dealt with in the NSW Local Courts relates to possession of child pornography.

Look, too, at child sexual assault (children under the age of 15).

The latest figures I’ve seen, in a study conducted at the University of NSW, show that in NSW District Courts the most frequently charged offence of all cases finalised was sexual assault, with sexual offences against children constituting 66 per cent of that total.

The courts are drowning in sex cases. 

NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos is interested and has established a working party to look at addressing this social and criminal problem with specialist judges. The Premier seems to be behind it as well, if her announcements following the Australian Law Reform Commission report on family violence are any indication.

Why would anyone plead guilty to child sexual assault when they have an 80 per cent chance of getting off (or, as criminal lawyers prefer to put it, being found not guilty)?

To cap it off, more than half the appeals in NSW against conviction for child sexual assault are successful.

It is not as though Australian jurisdictions have been without innovation in reforms, especially to protect children giving evidence in courts. It is just that the reforms have had no impact on reporting, attrition and conviction rates.

One of the foremost authorities on child sex crimes is Associate Professor Annie Cossins, from the law school at the University of NSW.

States- The judicial leadership is opposed to the creation of a specialist sex offenders court at the District Court level. Maybe that is a reflection of an edifice complex and the need to keep empires large and imposing, without bits being shaved off for special attention. There was even some resistance at the higher levels of the bench

NSW Attorney-General John Hatzistergos is interested and has established a working party to look at addressing this social and criminal problem with specialist judges. The Premier seems to be behind it as well, if her announcements following the Australian Law Reform Commission report on family violence are any indication.

that the disproportionate court time spent on sex crimes, particularly against children, the low rate of conviction and the ”tidal wave” of child pornography were evidence enough that something radical needed to be tried. But apparently not.

<<<<<     =====     >>>>>.       ==========è

Subject: Children under threat.

All my concerns about the amendment to the proposed Family Law Violence Bill 2010. were made to The total submissions I made to the Public Consultative Family Violence Bill, of the Family Law Branch, of the Attorney General Department, on 8^th January 2011..

Suffice as to say in conclusion that the basic following points must be considered seriously.

1)     Reading of the Family SA Report should be of assistance to how giving more power to state government agency may not function better.

 a)             Reliance on single experts instead of conducting proper assessment of a child’s well being by studying their interaction with family members, in different circumstances and over a period of time;

b)             Adversarial proceedings instead of proper investigation into factors affecting the wellbeing of the child (e.g. making State government agencies evidence available to judges) without one side or the other presenting it 

c)             Evidence problems – missing, tampered with, not considered documents admitted.

d)             A specific definition of abuse must be included as being deprivation of meaningful contact with primary carer (usually the mother) who has not been accused or convicted of any wrongdoing

e)               Parenting history must be taken into account

f)             Children must be given far more of a voice and a choice.  Most are perfectly capable of speaking for themselves at 9 years old – some earlier, some later but they should be given a chance. Even children under 5 should be assessed as to physical and emotional state at the rime of separation of the parents.

3)     Suppression orders.  Justice is not done and certainly not seen to be done in these secretive courts. .

a)              .Media and others should be able to know about processes.  Transparency might help achieve fairer and safer decisions Judges conduct.  They should be accountable and trained in at least common politeness and respect for anyone appearing in their court.

b)             .Nobody (e.g. psychiatrist/counsellor) should be able to interview children alone and without video of the interview being taken.

4)     The High Court ruling about shared parenting orders needing to be ‘reasonable and practicable’ has been addressed to some extent by the Family Law Amendment (Validation of Certain Parenting Orders) Bill 2010 passed on 26 November.

a)             In other cases where bad and wrong decisions have been made by courts to the detriment of children, revisiting these matters must be made possible without adversarial process and without having to pay lawyers to do it all again. Most mothers that we know are physically, emotionally and financially unable to restart any part of this process.

b)             All parents and children who have been harmfully affected since July 2006 because of what is basically a government error should be compensated by having their cases reviewed at no cost to them.  The mothers (for example) should be granted freedom to show their good will by allowing the father access as long as there is no abuse involved.

In a nut shell. If

1)      If Judges act independently of lawyers in allowing them to directly cross examine bother mother and father regarding facts about violence, wealth, psychological allegation of one against the other.

2)      If Judges are required to give identical orders as to the treatment or professional assessment reports such as mental state, anger management, shared parenting policy and the like. Then there would be no mother or father Judge or Magistrate bias allegations.

3)     If lawyers are still to be in the system in Family Law Child custardy cases and children to have their own lawyers represent them. Then those lawyers should be required as mandatory to

a)             Meet those children within 7 days of being appointed.

b)             To have those children psychologically assessed as to their mental state at the time of separation.

c)              To have those children psychologically assessed periodically 6 months minimum 1 year maximum as to their mental state during the time of living with one parent over another. If there is be a change of parenting from mother to father or visa versa. Then the deteriorating mental state of the children under the protection of one parent over the other should be picked up quickly and problem reversed for the better.

 d)             The child lawyer to have spoken to have those children before every court hearing as to their wishes who they want to care for them, the mother or the father.

        If the children are to young to young to talk then the child lawyer is required to assess the physically and emotional state of the children,

4)      In this way there would be minimised any bias allowed for by Judges.

a)            There should be equal rights of the father and the mother in a court of law that is not affected by financial ability of having assistance of a lawyer over the other.

b)             The requirement of the child lawyer to actively engage the children directly minimises the lawyer’s preconceived bias towards a mother or father. AND to recognise, and minimums dangerous environment to the children may be in contact.

c)            The interests of the child would then become more apparent than it is now perceived to be in law but NOT in practise.

These few changes will be a big step forward for the children. I am sure.

In general the children are affected no matter what political persuasion the parents have.

There would be more detrimental effects on children from low income (mainly Labor supporters) than from high income (mainly Liberal supporters).

The costs to the government may be high at the beginning when children a small. But will be very low as those children become into adulthood.

If little or no changes are made I am sure that domestic violence will double and community crime will sky rocket as today’s children become spiteful, revengeful and with low esteem and education in to adulthood.

The government will reap what it sows.

<<<<<     =====     >>>>>.==========

Date  19/03/2011.

Reference: Selecting Family Law Judges.

Dear Reader,

We in South Australia had life time appointments for Court Judges appointments.

We in South Australia had life time Justices of the Peace.

We have introduced a mystery shopping taxi service for Taxi driver behaviour and consumer over charging.

There has been in recent times Judges that have been old or with psychological problems that have been caught drink driving numerous times before the behaviour of the particular judge has come under scrutineer.

1)                Considering that every profession looks after their own.

2)                Considering that every profession has a bias culture of some sort.

a)        .Then the best way to reduce culture is to increase people doing

the selection of appointments to come from as many diverse cultures.

That is selected by the people for the people. (Selection by

I)   Nominated by a panel of judges or similar as is at present about 4 in number. 2 from each political persuasion or factions.

II)     The names then go to a panel of Citizens nominated and selected similar to present system of Jury panels.

III)    The Jury kind of panel then interviews the nominees and selects the best for the job.

b)        .Then comes in the mystery shopper type assessment.

I)   I as a grand parent did attend the courts. I did sit in to court proceedings to assess and compare judges.

II)      I as a grand parent did attend the courts. I did sit in to court proceedings to assess and compare lawyers and their morality.

As un-bias as possible.

III)    Details as how this would work I suggest contacting the SA Taxi Board to obtain guide lines with mystery taxi passengers.

 In short a pear professional from a different court system and Australian state sits in the hear the proceedings as a normal citizen.

 Or

it can be a group of appointed people (say appointed for 1 or 2 years to be mystery observers) They can come from a combination of

a politician, a fellow judge, a lawyers an appointed person from a social agency like Relationship Australia or Anglicare.

Each one at different times sit in a court for 1 hour and listens to the court proceedings at different times at random and records and assesses the Family Court Judge or Magistrate during the 9 years, On the 10 th year there would be a submission of each mystery person to assess the suitability for renominating and appointing that Judge or Magistrate. For another 10 years.

3)               As regards appointment for life of a Judge. There should always be an escape clause as is in SA. Mental capability. Bankruptcy etc.

Also the continual appoint should be based on the amount of appeals made by lawyers against that Judge and the number of judgements of the appeals which are up held.

That should be for all Judges and in all jurisdictions.

If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.

In conclusion, I await your considered opinion on this topic.

Yours faithfully, Joe Rossi. Dated 19032011.

<<<<<     =====     >>>>>.==========

 Below are Actual correspondence and reminder Notes without trying to indemnify individuals in child abuse case..

 Dated 09/11/2010.

Reference: Family Law Act.

 Dear Honourable Minister Butler, MP. 

 It has been over 12 months since I approached you about needed changes to the Australian Federal Family Law Act. There has already been in the past 2 years over 6 publically known child murders from the hands of violent vindictive parent.

 I have tried to be as unbiased as possible towards any gender father or mother.
I suggest the only solutions possible are as follows. 

I am quite happy to come to your office and discuss these important current children problems.

 If you consider that the example below is accurate in detail. (I can assure it is). Could you conscience believe that the said children on probability be safe with the father and the environment your government may subject them to. Would you be happy if your children or grandchildren were in such am environment and what would you do about it?

 If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.

 In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also your considered reply.

 Thank you.

 Yours faithfully,

 Joseph Peter Rossi. Grandfather age 63 years. Local voter.

Get ride of children in a violent environment AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
Fix shared parenting of non-violent parents latter.

<-<<<<<     =====     >>>>>.==========è

Violent parent, perpetrator, says the children need a father. That may be so.

                But not just a father. They need TO love, comfort, TO laughter WITH, encourage AND PLAY.

 a)     Something Violent parent, perpetrator, did not show TOWARDS son and daughter when we were together. Violent parent,
        perpetrator, joined us at
        the playground. He would talk to his parents and friends on the mobile while the children entertained themselves on play equipment.
b)     After the birth of 2nd child a daughter, Violent parent, perpetrator, did not show any love, comfort, laughter and was not prepared to listen
        during our marriage
         towards me or the children. He never woke up during the night to assist in looking after a sick child.
c)     Violent parent, perpetrator, has not indicated in Text messages, correspondence, or Child excess centre comments after the
        final court order
        of April 2009. Any love, comfort, laughter behaviour.
 g)     Son has been noticed to by me, my parents and the Adelaide Child care Teachers bight on his tee shirts when stressed especially
        after contact with his father.
d)     Violent parent, perpetrator, made statements in his own court affidavits that he did believe in celebration of Christmas day with the
         extended family but contradicted himself in the first affidavit when he indicates he wanted the

mother-in-law to go home the day before Christmas day in Sydney 2006
 

                    a)     New South Wales Court records show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has been convicted the use of

violence towards me.
                    b)     South Australian Court records show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has driven passenger vehicle recklessly while his children were with him.
                    c)      South Australian Court records show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has use threats to people
                    d)     South Australian Family Law Court records will show that Violent parent, perpetrator, has misled, and manipulated the truth to the court.

                         e)     South Australian Family Law Court records do not show the Army posting orders on which the court made its final court orders on April 2009.
                          f)        That Violent parent, perpetrator, made statements in his own court affidavits that he did believe in celebration of Christmas day with
                                 the extended family but contradicted himself in the first affidavit when he indicates he wanted my mother Annette Maternal grandfather
                                 to leave before I celebrated Christmas day with her.
                 8)     I Victim Bernadette  do hereby finally state that I am very concerned about the safety and emotional conflicts influences Violent parent,
                        perpetrator, the father will have on the children without continual Psychological treatment for which Violent parent, perpetrator, has refused
                        to under go as per Court order of April 2009.

9)    The Former Husband, Mr. Violent parent, perpetrator, Sydney NSW.
It is not an argument on adult freedom or parent’s rights of violent parent, perpetrator, or me, but the safety of children first and foremost. Violent parent, perpetrator, has a split personality. One minute he is calm when he gets his way and next he is in a rage and violent when he is challenged.

If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.

In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also your considered reply.

 Yours sincerely

(Maternal grandfather): ==========, ==========, ==========,

<-<<<<<     =====     >>>>>.==========è

20)  Traits, Profile call it what you will:

                                  i.          Violent parent, perpetrator, DOB 10/01/1974, Violent, quick Tempered, twists the truth, self interested, and wants to win at all

Costs does not give opinions when opposing views. Does not assess argumentative debates.

                                ii.          Violent parent, perpetrator.

                               iii.          Narcissist. Excessive, self admiration, Personality disorder, self directed sexual desire.

                               iv.          Violent parent, perpetrator, use of words Antonyms with opposite meaning To his actions or behaviour.

                                v.          1st born, son..

                               vi.          2nd born daughter.

                               vii.         3rd born were twin daughters.

                             viii.          Violent parent, perpetrator, Partner Grandfather was admitted To Julia Farr Hospital. (Why) Mental disorder.

                               ix.          Violent parent, perpetrator, accused Joe Maternal grandfather My father of being Domineering, violent, bashing, controlling,

==========,==========,==========,==========,==========

                        It is not an argument on adult freedom or rights, but the safety of children first and foremost.

 21)             Violent parent, perpetrator, Requests

Has informed me (objected to me)

                                i.          Not to contact his Army Psychologist.

                               ii.          Non of my business about his place of abode or home telephone  Number.

                              iii.          Has approached the Bella Kindy regards his parent attended

          There. I arranged and gave permission but either violent parent, Perpetrator, did not

          Inform them or the parents did not attend the Kindy at the arranged Day.

                              iv.          Violent parent, perpetrator, has requested additional whole week Access to Ethan and

Bella only and not the children Michaela and Liarna.

                               v.          Violent parent, perpetrator, has requested additional access to Ethan and Bella only and

Not the children Michaela and Liarna.

                              vi.          Violent parent, perpetrator, has refused to take up the Wednesday Thursday children

Access as per court order.

22)             Victim now Requests

                                  i.          Would like the Court orders to remain as they are. No changes

                                 ii.          that I am very concerned about the safety and

Emotional infliction on the children by the father

                               iii.           Violent parent, perpetrator, the father must continual

Psychological treatment for which Violent parent, perpetrator,

Has refused to under go as per Court order of April 2009.

                              iv.          That the restraining order on me to remain in Adelaide be

Removed so that I may seek work and living quarters as is necessary.

Violent parent, perpetrator, has been working in Sydney New South Wales.

                                v.          That Father’s parents not to have unsupervised visits with grandchildren unless:-

The family court assesses the property for Safety environment first

                              vi.          That Violent parent, perpetrator, pays contribution to the costs

Of swimming activities of the children because of his car

Debts for 2 years. I am spending $15 each child 26 weeks a year

Total $    1,560.00

========== End of Lawyer instruction ==========

 Dictionary Meanings

Narcissist                                                Politicians against changes are

It is about perceptions of lawyers getting paid win or lose. and to the lawyers it is just a game of chess.

 ========== Here after are Quotes only ==========

1. Wikipedia, the free encyclopaedia references

• Unprincipled narcissist - including antisocial features. A charlatan - is a fraudulent, exploitative, deceptive and unscrupulous individual.

• amorous narcissist - including histrionic features. The Don Juan of our times - is erotic, exhibitionist.

• Compensatory narcissist - including negativistic (passive-aggressive), avoidant features.

• elitist narcissist - variant of pure pattern. Corresponds to Wilhelm Reich's "phallic narcissistic" personality type.

• Fanatic type - including paranoid features. A severely narcissistically wounded individual, usually with major paranoid tendencies who holds onto an illusion of omnipotence
• An oversensitive temperament at birth is the main symptomatic chronic form
• Overindulgence and overvaluation by parents
• Valued by parents as a means to regulate their own self-esteem
• Excessive admiration that is never balanced with realistic feedback
• Unpredictable or unreliable care giving from parents
• Severe emotional abuse in childhood
• Being praised for perceived exceptional looks or talents by adults
• Excessive praise for good behaviours or excessive criticism for poor behaviours in childhood

==========,==========,==========,==========,==========

The cause of multiple personality is not clearly understood, but the condition seems almost invariably to be associated with severe physical abuse and neglect in childhood. It is believed that amnesia, the key to formation of the separate personalities, occurs as a psychological barrier to seal off unbearably painful experiences from consciousness. The disorder often occurs in childhood but may not be recognized until much later. Social and psychological impairment ranges from mild to severe. The primary treatment is psychotherapy to help the individual integrate the separate personalities.

========== Argument for change the Law. ==========

Victim  placid parent, perpetrator violent parent whose paternal Grand parents also violent.

What is potential or real in the following topics? i am trying to argue the case by examples that the 

LISTED PROFESSIONALS NEED QUALIFICATION AND VERIFICATION TO DO THE TASKS.

But Violent parents are not required to under go rehabilitation, or examination to be verified they can supervise children
without temper tantrum, or resorting to uncontrolled physical or mental assault on small children.

 Reference: Progression of Violent Parent.

 Yet the hypocritical politicians still require this same person to have unsupervised free access to the children without

 Why.

 ¨      Where is the profiling of violent parents within the Family Law Courts or Psychologists? A must to do the right thing for the
     Australian Attorney General podium media high moral motto in legislation “what is best for the Children.”
¨      There are for everything else.

<<<<<     =====     >>>>>.==========è

 Reference: Family Law Act.                                                            Dated 04/11/2010

 Dear Honourable Butler, MP.  

 It has been over 12 months since I approached you about needed changes to the Australian Federal Family Law Act.
There has already been in the past 2 years over 6 publically known child murders from the hands of violent vindictive parent.

 Being as unbiased as possible towards any gender father or mother. I suggest the only solutions possible are as follows.

  (Facts 1)

1)     There has been and are many parents, especially fathers who lobby for equal access to their children.

2)     There has been and are many fathers who through no fault of their own but by women scorn that have been denied access to their children.

3)     There has been and are many fathers who have been violent to the wife and children due to the belief of ownership of the family members.

4)     There has been and are many fathers and mothers equally who have been violent to the children due to a narcissist attitude or genetic make up.

5)     There have been many acts of cruelty as well as murders of children by violent parents having unsupervised court sanctioned access to the children.

 (Facts 2)

1)     This is a very contentious issue where there is no clear winner as to which parent is the least violent to have custardy of the children. Assuming that no one thinks ahead for 2 or more years. Or from Childhood to parenthood.

1)      The solution can only be fact finding based on a long history searching for bad behaviors. of a particular person to evaluate access to the children should therefore be limited based on the best accurate probability of repeated bad behaviors. (Leopard never changes its spots.) Persons could not plan, manipulate, or copy bad violent behavior towards each other over such a long period of time. Near impossible unless in built characteristics.

2)      The changes can not be based on gender bias as it affects equally the fathers as well as the mothers.

3)      The behavior of children is directly related to copying acts and thoughts from parents.

 (Facts 3) What changes must be made to improve the current Family Law Act.

1)     That the Courts Magistrates and Judges be given more power to cross examine individual parents directly in child custody cases.

2)     That lawyers be band from litigation in court of children access issues.

It is not an argument on violent parent adult freedom or rights, but the safety of children first and foremost.

3)     That all primary school to adulthood criminal history or violent behavior of both the parents be accessible by the Family Courts in regards to educational and medical history.  The aim that the parent with the most criminal behavior and excess drug, alcohol and violent tendencies lose access and custody rights of the children.

4)     That the family Courts also keep and investigate the records of other Family members (Parents, Grandparents and siblings, in Family Court Affidavits for consistencies or irregularities brought before the court, that may help ascertain the facts or potential of which parent the children will be the better to have custody under.  Aim to choose the parent with the best history potential to be given full custody (guardianship) of the children in relation to up bringing.

 Aim: To change the current Family Law Act.

a)                     Break the cycle of violence from violent parent to child.

b)                     Less legal costing to passive parent.

c)                      Less ability to use vendetta by narcissist parent.

d)                     Less ability for the dominant parent to fudge, manipulates, and fabricates evidence to the detriment of the children.

e)                     The children will have less emotional distress to carry into adult hood by not being associated weekly from bickering parents.

f)                        To reduce the number of instances where the dominate parent uses continual financial advantage, threats, Intimidation, physical
            and or emotional assaults, potentially from a child age 1 to 12 (continually for some 11 years).

g)                     It will take away the perceived legal right to litigation by a violent parent.

h)                      It will give forward standards of behaviour to potential parents who love challenging authority (governments, Courts, Police,
            School teachers, sexual partners) by past and future bad violent behaviour.

 I am quite happy to come to your office and discuss these important current children problems.

 If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.

 In conclusion, I await your confirmation of receipt of this letter and also your considered reply. I note that your office tool over 6months to respond
    or acknowledge my concerns.

 Thank you.

 Yours faithfully, Joe Rossi, Maternal Grand father, age 63. Campaigner for Changing the Australian Family Law Act .

Australia the Luckiest Country on Earth if you are NOT a child.

For which Premier Rann, Prime Minister Gillard  the Australian Attorney General podium media high moral motto in legislation
“what is best for the Children.” .Which the courts, money hungry lawyers and our protectors (the parliamentarians) have no moral, no conscience, no balls to intervene to stopping the circle of violence towards children. Children do not vote so why intervene and lose the votes of the parents.

<<<<<     =====     >>>>>.=====èEnd of topic<

Written and Printed by Joe Rossi, a High School educated bilingual Italian Australian Grandfather age 63

 attending on a fact finding mission at random in to the Adelaide Family law Courts

 without the assistance of

NO one equivalent to the 100 or so Rann University $120 thousand a year spin doctors.
What you read is what you get. No hidden meanings.