March 4 th. 2008.

To Mr. Geraldine McKay,

Department of Defence, Moorebank Ave, Liverpool Military Area,

NSW 2174.

Reference: Reconciliation between me and husband Craftsman Violent Husband 

Dear Ms. McKay,

I like to inform you that I am in Adelaide living with my parents and away from Violent Husband my husband for a while.

(1)     I like to inform you that yesterday e-mail from Violent Husband to my father was not sent with my input or consent. No reference to me should be made.

(2)    I like to inform you that all past e-mails and correspondence between Violent  Husband my husband and JJ. my father referring to word “us”

    I had no input or consent. No reference to me should be made or inferred.

(3)     I like my correspondence with you to be confidential unless prior agreement.

(4)     The e-mail of xx/02/08 indicates to me that Violent Husband is not prepared to change his behavior of ownership of me. This is not acceptable to me.

Direct further correspondence to the above address.

Thank you. Yours sincerely, Wife

====================          ====================

June 24^th. 2008.

To The Deputy Prime Minister of Australia,

Honorable Julia Gillard, Suit MG-41, Parliament House,

CANBERRA   ACT    2600.

Reference: Mr. Violent Husband  domestic violence.

Incident No: E62xx1302, Charge No. H323xx354,

Court House Downing Center. xx/03/2008.

Also

Contribution to Child abuse.

Dear Deputy Prime Minister,

Thank you for your quick effective response to my letter of June 08.

(Dissatisfaction of Minister Snowden response.)

I was contacted by Colonel Geof Quirk on Saturday xx/06/08.

We discussed the matter of

 The respect of a wife is directly related to the respect of one’s own mother.

 The changes I like to bring about within the Defence Force organization are.

(1)     The next of kin in all case except violence should be the married partner.

(2)     In the cases of Partner bashing the next of kin shall be the Mother and or Father of the victim.

(3)     The Defence Forces shall immediately contact

(a)     The parents of the victim giving full details of time,

(b)    Nature of bashing,

(c)     Police contacted,

(d)    Hospital attended,

(e)     Army number and full name of Offender,

(f)      Army Social Worker to liaise with the Victims parents.

 Information that was refused initially to me.

The results of the discussion was No changes, responsibility is that of the civil police.

This is not good enough.

I am absolutely sure my family is not the only one in this predicament. There would be thousands of couples and if each had two children then 2 thousand

children are abused every day.

 May you take the following facts into consideration about Army personnel giving official work references to Civilian Courts?

 (a)                Major Saker of xx/01/2008 paragraph 6 (Isolation of the incident)

And compare it with Patrick’s own affidavit of 21/04/2008 page 5 paragraph 20.

What does show inaccurate, poor investigation and to pervert the course of Justice to the civil Police prosecutor and to the

 Federal Magistrate Court Judge,

Colonel remarks,

They have an independent right. If officers are wrong then victim has the right to sue the officer through the civil courts.

 Compare your paragraph 4 relaxation techniques and the end result makes no sense.  If he had been cured he would not have continued to

show ongoing problems. The date of your report also makes a mockery of the report as it is made only 16 days after the assault and before

any mean full treatment assessed.

Colonel remarks,

The army cannot force a person to undergo treatment without consent.

 (b)               See and read report from Your violent soldier’s supervising Major Pater Young of xx/02/2008.

Again compare it with the conduct of leaving abuse threatening phone messages on my answering machine Sunday xx/04/2008.

 (I have it recorded and can send his voice to you if you give me your Mobile Phone Number)

Again showing he has not listened, or understood, the marriage reconciliation your organization gave him.

Violent Husband has played the system of and made a mockery of any help that has been offered by you 2 Majors.

You may have the better qualifications but Violent Husband is street smarter than both of you.  This shows he has no remorse for his actions,

he has continued to intimidate and also shows that the Army have not treated him so he is a definite danger to his children's safety

(c)          Have you both Majors ever got Violent Husband to write down what I and my wife have really done to deserve such hostility. Or

Is just general comment about some one just good enough to solve the problem? One must find the cause, identify the reasons and on

 probability find a solution.

As Majors of a group of people you should get the full story of all parties before you come up with a conclusion.

(d)               Your lack of full investigation and quick conclusion make it that you both are not diligent in your work over humans and this raises

        how questionable our skills are umpires).

(e)                I can assure you that I did bring my children to avoid arguments if at all possible, never to commence arguments,

        but by hell defend themselves.

(f)                 Violent Husband grabbed Wife and through her out onto the concrete path 11 days after an operation, Wife wanted to get out

        of the back yard through the garage doors, but Violent Husband continued to pursue her.

It was then that Wife talked down a broom handle attack  and in Defence threw her hands at Violent Husband and Violent Husband punched

Wife in the face cracking the left cheek bone, nearly causing her to lose her eyesight in her left eye. 

(g)                The way Violent Husband may have told you of the events was that he was attacked first and he defended himself..

.If I did not know the history personally I may have come to the same conclusion at first assessment.

With written statement from both it could be shown on probability who was telling the truth. Why not at least check the Police Report.

(h)                Your lack of diligence, due care and trivializing of the Violence makes your profession trivial as well and put the victim in danger of her life.

Colonel remarks,

They (supervisors) have an independent right. If officers are wrong then victim has the right to sue the officer through the civil courts.

 The results of the discussion was No changes, responsibility is that of a civilian matter not the Defence Force.

This is not good enough.

( I )                 Do Defence personnel undertake IQ tests for trade acceptance

Answer Yes

( j )                 Do Defence personnel undertake psychological  tests

Answer Yes, before and after sent to a war zone

(k)                 Violent Husband  deployed  to  Fiji on the ship  and experienced a helicopter crash

( l )          Violent Husband  therefore suffered psychological disorder.

Colonel remarks,

        I was not aware will investigate.

(m)               I say that the two Majors that put their name on official Army letter head were aware of PP.’s conditions and did nothing

    but interfere with civil law proceedings.

Major Young breached the confidentiality of correspondence between myself JJ., (father of Wife) and between

Wife and her legal case with the Adelaide Magistrate property dispute.

 I requested Colonel if he would reprimand the Major,

Colonel remarks, no need.

Considering that I as a in-law would know just as much as the Army supervisor in regards to his name place of residence, occupation, place of occupation, and age There would be no need for the army to hide behind the privacy laws.

Alternatively if privacy laws are to be maintained then it must work both ways.

When there has been conflict. Information from the army stays in the army and information outside the army is none of the army business.

Also correspondence from a civilian to the army supervisor stays with the supervisor. Not relayed to the offender and visa versa.

When you compare National Football and Rugby players who do domestic Violence like Wayne Kerry,

When there are judges for domestic Violence or speeding.

They get punished by the civil courts, then by the media and finally their employer, Football clubs issue match fines, or suspensions as likewise the Olympic contestants.

I find no reason why Defence personnel who bring the establishment in to disrepute should get away free. Not even a reprimand. 

Please also find enclosed another complaint about the Federal Magistrate Brown. For interest that needs legislation changed.

There is so much miss carriage of justice in protecting children that I will not rest till changes to respective legislation are implemented to prevent repetition of the same to others as it has happened to this daughter.

====================          ====================

 If you have any queries or need further explanation please do not hesitate to contact me as above.

Yours sincerely, Mr. Father of wife

240608.

To the date of 24/06/2009 only one hour treatment given by Army to Violent Parent for Domestic Violence.

====================   June 2009.  ========== Copy Right ( C )